linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ath10k: retrieve MAC address from firmware if provided

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:29:15 +0200
From:   Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
To:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, govinds@...eaurora.org,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: retrieve MAC address from firmware if provided

On 8/13/2018 7:14 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 11:26 AM Arend van Spriel
> <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/11/2018 1:39 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> Devices may provide their own MAC address via system firmware (e.g.,
>>
>> You got me confused by using just "firmware" in the subject.
>
> Yeah...I started by writing this patch with device tree specifically
> (of_get_mac_address()), and then later found that there were generic
> "device" helpers for this, which can assist with other sorts of
> firmware nodes. It was easier to put a name on a device tree patch
> than on a "device" patch. I suppose "system firmware" might be a
> better description?
>
>>> device tree), especially in the case where the device doesn't have a
>>> useful EEPROM on which to store its MAC address (e.g., for integrated
>>> Wifi).
>>>
>>> Use the generic device helper to retrieve the MAC address, and (if
>>> present) honor it above the MAC address advertised by the card.
>>
>> But this put me back on track ;-)
>
> Let me know if you have a better way to clarify. I can resend with a
> slightly modified subject (s/firmware/system firmware/), or let Kalle
> do it, if that's the only thing to change.

"system firmware" substitution works for me.

Regards,
Arend