Message-ID: <CAAFQd5CGhkfTRzSdTqtFh4zuQuFH0H5SVyKWtk98Ceh_izo4=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:11:07 +0900
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc:     Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
        Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
        Sean Paul <seanpaul@...gle.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: update cursors asynchronously through atomic.

Hi Enric,

On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:53 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balletbo@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Add support to async updates of cursors by using the new atomic
> interface for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> This first version is slightly different from the RFC, note that I did
> not maintain the Sean reviewed tag for that reason. With this version I
> don't touch the atomic_update function and all is implemented in the
> async_check/update functions. See the changelog for a list of changes.
>
> The patch was tested on a Samsung Chromebook Plus in two ways.
>
>  1. Running all igt kms_cursor_legacy and kms_atomic@...ne_cursor_legacy
>     tests and see that there is no regression after the patch.
>
>  2. Running weston using the atomic API.

Thanks for the patch. This feature might look like a really minor
thing, but we really had hard time dealing with users complaints, so
having this in upstream would be a really useful thing.

Let me post some comments inline.

>
> Best regards,
>   Enric
>
> Changes in v1:
> - Rebased on top of drm-misc
> - In async_check call drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state to check that
>   the desired plane is valid and update various bits of derived state
>   (clipped coordinates etc.)
> - In async_check allow to configure new scaling in the fast path.
> - In async_update force to flush all registered PSR encoders.
> - In async_update call atomic_update directly.
> - In async_update call vop_cfg_done needed to set the vop registers and take effect.
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> index e9f91278137d..dab70056ee73 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> @@ -811,10 +811,63 @@ static void vop_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
>         spin_unlock(&vop->reg_lock);
>  }
>
> +static int vop_plane_atomic_async_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> +                                       struct drm_plane_state *state)
> +{
> +       struct vop_win *vop_win = to_vop_win(plane);
> +       const struct vop_win_data *win = vop_win->data;
> +       int min_scale = win->phy->scl ? FRAC_16_16(1, 8) :
> +                                       DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;
> +       int max_scale = win->phy->scl ? FRAC_16_16(8, 1) :
> +                                       DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (plane != state->crtc->cursor)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (!plane->state)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       if (!plane->state->fb ||
> +           plane->state->fb != state->fb)
> +               return -EINVAL;

While it covers for quite a big part of cursor movements, you may
still expect jumpy cursor when hoovering text boxes or hyperlinks,
since it changes the cursor image. Our downstream patch [1] actually
took care of changing the framebuffer as well, although with the added
complexity of referencing the old buffer at update time and releasing
it in a flip work.

[1] https://chromium.git.corp.google.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/1ad887e1a1349991c9e137b48cb32086e65347fc%5E%21/

> +
> +       ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(plane->state,
> +                                                 plane->crtc->state,
> +                                                 min_scale, max_scale,
> +                                                 true, true);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vop_plane_atomic_async_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> +                                         struct drm_plane_state *new_state)
> +{
> +       struct vop *vop = to_vop(plane->state->crtc);
> +
> +       plane->state->crtc_x = new_state->crtc_x;
> +       plane->state->crtc_y = new_state->crtc_y;
> +       plane->state->crtc_h = new_state->crtc_h;
> +       plane->state->crtc_w = new_state->crtc_w;
> +       plane->state->src_x = new_state->src_x;
> +       plane->state->src_y = new_state->src_y;
> +       plane->state->src_h = new_state->src_h;
> +       plane->state->src_w = new_state->src_w;
> +
> +       if (vop->is_enabled) {
> +               rockchip_drm_psr_flush_all(plane->dev);

We should use the inhibit mechanism when accessing VOP hardware. While
the flush is expected to keep the PSR disabled for at least 100 ms,
we're not in any atomic (pun not intended) context here and might get
preempted for some unspecified time in very high load conditions.

Best regards,
Tomasz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists