[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5B-TN7G_UBXMEExnFQT0RtSRMxF5baV98Bj8mdzMVBLvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:29:12 +0900
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Sandy Huang <hjc@...k-chips.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...gle.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: update cursors asynchronously through atomic.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:26 PM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 13. August 2018, 09:11:07 CEST schrieb Tomasz Figa:
> > Hi Enric,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:53 AM Enric Balletbo i Serra
> > <enric.balletbo@...labora.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add support to async updates of cursors by using the new atomic
> > > interface for that.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> > > ---
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This first version is slightly different from the RFC, note that I did
> > > not maintain the Sean reviewed tag for that reason. With this version I
> > > don't touch the atomic_update function and all is implemented in the
> > > async_check/update functions. See the changelog for a list of changes.
> > >
> > > The patch was tested on a Samsung Chromebook Plus in two ways.
> > >
> > > 1. Running all igt kms_cursor_legacy and kms_atomic@...ne_cursor_legacy
> > > tests and see that there is no regression after the patch.
> > >
> > > 2. Running weston using the atomic API.
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. This feature might look like a really minor
> > thing, but we really had hard time dealing with users complaints, so
> > having this in upstream would be a really useful thing.
> >
> > Let me post some comments inline.
> >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Enric
> > >
> > > Changes in v1:
> > > - Rebased on top of drm-misc
> > > - In async_check call drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state to check that
> > > the desired plane is valid and update various bits of derived state
> > > (clipped coordinates etc.)
> > > - In async_check allow to configure new scaling in the fast path.
> > > - In async_update force to flush all registered PSR encoders.
> > > - In async_update call atomic_update directly.
> > > - In async_update call vop_cfg_done needed to set the vop registers and take effect.
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > > index e9f91278137d..dab70056ee73 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
> > > @@ -811,10 +811,63 @@ static void vop_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > > spin_unlock(&vop->reg_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int vop_plane_atomic_async_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > > + struct drm_plane_state *state)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vop_win *vop_win = to_vop_win(plane);
> > > + const struct vop_win_data *win = vop_win->data;
> > > + int min_scale = win->phy->scl ? FRAC_16_16(1, 8) :
> > > + DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;
> > > + int max_scale = win->phy->scl ? FRAC_16_16(8, 1) :
> > > + DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (plane != state->crtc->cursor)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (!plane->state)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (!plane->state->fb ||
> > > + plane->state->fb != state->fb)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > While it covers for quite a big part of cursor movements, you may
> > still expect jumpy cursor when hoovering text boxes or hyperlinks,
> > since it changes the cursor image. Our downstream patch [1] actually
> > took care of changing the framebuffer as well, although with the added
> > complexity of referencing the old buffer at update time and releasing
> > it in a flip work.
> >
> > [1] https://chromium.git.corp.google.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/1ad887e1a1349991c9e137b48cb32086e65347fc%5E%21/
>
> [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/394492
> for non-google people ;-)
>
Thanks, not sure how that internal link sneaked into my clipboard.
Should have checked what I pasted. :P
Best regards,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists