[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07e17009-18bb-df72-3408-7e8c0c11e16f@sembritzki.me>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:17:47 +0200
From: Yannik Sembritzki <yannik@...britzki.me>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dyoung@...hat.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Replace magic for trusting the secondary keyring with
#define
On 16.08.2018 15:15, David Howells wrote:
> I would suggest something like that. I've switched the patches over as has
> been suggested. I think it makes more sense to create the constant first and
> then use that.
>
> I've also fleshed out the patch description a bit and added cc and Fixes
> fields as appropriate.
Thanks, that looks good to me.
I see that you only cc'd stable@ in the (now) second patch. I'm curious,
will this automatically apply the first patch to stable?
Yannik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists