linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethernet: lpc_eth: Use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B77B5C3.8060908@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:59:31 +0800
From:   zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To:     Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
        <keescook@...omium.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ethernet: lpc_eth: Use NULL to compare with pointer-typed
 value rather than 0

On 2018/8/17 23:29, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi zhong jiang,
>
> On 08/17/2018 04:18 PM, zhong jiang wrote:
>> We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than 0.
>> The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c
>> index 08381ef..04d9e62 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c
>> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ static int lpc_eth_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  				"IRAM not big enough for net buffers, using SDRAM instead.\n");
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (pldat->dma_buff_base_v == 0) {
>> +	if (pldat->dma_buff_base_v == NULL) {
> That's a valid finding, but please use a common 0 and NULL comparison in form of
>
> 	if (!pldat->dma_buff_base_v)
>
> To the change above please feel free to add my
>
> Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
 Thanks, Will do in v2
>>  		ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>>  		if (ret)
>>  			goto err_out_free_irq;
>>
>
> .
>