[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B77B9B1.9070203@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 14:16:17 +0800
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>,
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide: Use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather
than 0
On 2018/8/17 21:23, zhong jiang wrote:
> We should use NULL to compare with pointer-typed value rather than
> 0. The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/ide/pmac.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/pmac.c b/drivers/ide/pmac.c
> index c5b902b..673734b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/pmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/pmac.c
> @@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ static int pmac_ide_init_dma(ide_hwif_t *hwif, const struct ide_port_info *d)
> /* We won't need pci_dev if we switch to generic consistent
> * DMA routines ...
> */
> - if (dev == NULL || pmif->dma_regs == 0)
> + if (dev == NULL || pmif->dma_regs == NULL)
> return -ENODEV;
> /*
> * Allocate space for the DBDMA commands.
Maybe if (!dev || !pmif->dma_regs) is better, Will repost in v2.
Thanks,
zhong jiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists