[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <177f25ad-de40-ce3f-987f-ac34c2559be4@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2018 08:37:59 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: make *config regression: pkg-build
On 08/19/2018 04:15 AM, Meelis Roos wrote:
> Just tried to run 'make menuconfig' on v4.18-10568-g08b5fa819970 and
> found a bad surprise:
>
> 'make *config' requires 'pkg-config'. Please install it.
> make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/Makefile:219: scripts/kconfig/.mconf-cfg] Error 1
>
> This is clearly a regression - I have libncurses devele pakcage
> installed in the default system location (as do 99%+ on actuall
> develeopers proobably) and in this case, pkg-config is useless.
> pkg-config is needed only when libraries and headers are installed in
> non-default locations but it is bad to require installation of
> pkg-config on all the machines where make menuconfig would be possibly
> run (for example, I have a aboult 100 machine kernel testbed with
> self-hosted kernel compilation and machine-specific kernel
> configurations that ocassionally need tweaking).
>
> I notice 4.18 complained it can not find pkg-config but still worked.
> This is clearly better than now.
>
> If we want to support developers with libraries in non-default
> locations, why not - but the common case of system include path should
> work without any trouble or warnings. For exaple, test if compilation
> against ncurses works, and if not retry it with pkg-config (and error
> out if it does not give working result).
>
Hi,
This is due to my patch: 4ab3b80159d4db63b902ef635d4b5e882911b2da.
Yamada-san, any ideas? Feel free to just revert it.
thanks,
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists