[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180820092238.kvktwlovc64oa66e@wunner.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:22:38 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] PCI: pciehp: Ignore link events when there is a
fatal error pending
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:51:09PM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
> @@ -222,9 +222,27 @@ void pciehp_handle_disable_request(struct slot *slot)
> void pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change(struct slot *slot, u32 events)
> {
> struct controller *ctrl = slot->ctrl;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl->pcie->port;
> bool link_active;
> u8 present;
>
> + /* If a fatal error is pending, wait for AER or DPC to handle it. */
> + if (pcie_fatal_error_pending(pdev)) {
> + bool recovered;
> +
> + recovered = pcie_wait_fatal_error_clear(pdev);
> +
> + /* If the fatal error is gone and the link is up, return */
> + if (recovered && pcie_wait_for_link(pdev, true)) {
> + ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot(%s): Ignoring Link event due to successful fatal error recovery\n",
> + slot_name(slot));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot(%s): Fatal error recovery failed for Link event, trying hotplug reset\n",
> + slot_name(slot));
> + }
> +
This differs from v7 of the patch in that *any* fatal error, not just
a Surprise Link Down, results in pciehp waiting for the error to clear.
I'm wondering if that's safe: Theoretically, the user might quickly
swap the card in the slot during, say, a Completion Timeout Error,
and with this patch pciehp would carry on as if nothing happened.
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists