linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] usb: hide usb_of_get_companion_dev for CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB22931014287A7641FFBFBE56D8320@OSBPR01MB2293.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 03:22:04 +0000
From:   Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC:     gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] usb: hide usb_of_get_companion_dev for CONFIG_USB=n

Hi Arnd,

> From: Arnd Bergmann, Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 11:27 PM
> 
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:58 PM Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig
> > > index 0a16cbd4e528..663a8bd67a7b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig
> > > @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ config USB_RENESAS_USB3
> > >       tristate 'Renesas USB3.0 Peripheral controller'
> > >       depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
> > >       depends on EXTCON
> > > +     depends on USB || !USB
> >
> > Is this some weird standard idiom?  It looks really strange.
> 
> Yes, and yes.
> 
> A less common way to write it is
> 
>         depends on (USB != m) || m
> 
> which some people prefer, but I find even weirder.

Thank you for the patch!

On other thread, John mentions gadget-side drivers should not depend on host-side [1].
So, I submitted a patch today [2]. What do you think about my submitted patch?

[1]
https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=153433776202861&w=2

[2]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10569847/

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

>        Arnd