[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1534836620.dp1nz6tfz0.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:04:17 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@...il.com>,
ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
paul.burton@...s.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference
count (semaphore)
Song Liu wrote:
> I am testing the patch set with the following code:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> volatile short semaphore = 0;
>
> int for_uprobe(int c)
> {
> printf("%d\n", c + 10);
> return c + 1;
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> for_uprobe(argc);
> while (1) {
> sleep(1);
> printf("semaphore %d\n", semaphore);
> }
> }
>
> I created a uprobe on function for_uprobe(), that uses semaphore as
> reference counter:
>
> echo "p:uprobe_1 /root/a.out:0x49a(0x1036)" >> uprobe_events
Is that even valid? That _looks_ like a semaphore, but I'm not quite
sure that it qualifies as an _SDT_ semaphore. Do you see this issue if
you instead use the macros provided by <sys/sdt.h> to create SDT
markers?
- Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists