[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fe5542a-dd98-d021-b130-7c3145bba5a5@mageia.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:19:33 +0300
From: Thomas Backlund <tmb@...eia.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<gary.hook@....com>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: disabling psp in bios causes errors in dmesg
Den 21.8.2018 kl. 19:47, skrev Tom Lendacky:
> On 8/10/2018 9:11 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> On 8/10/2018 2:03 AM, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is tested on kernel 4.17.14
>>>
>>> hw:
>>>
>>> MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) bios 1.A0
>>>
>>> AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
>>>
>>>
>>> Disabling psp in bios gets this in the logs:
>> Hmm, I'm not familiar with that BIOS option so I'm not exactly sure what
>> it is doing under the covers. Having said that, it would seem that a
>> register read is indicating that SEV is supported when it is not on this
>> platform. Maybe the register read is returning all 1s, (i.e. 0xffffffff).
> The register read was returning all 1s. The issue was reported to the
> BIOS team and a fix is in process, but that may take some time to move
> through all the vendors. So in the meantime, see the next comment below.
>
>> You can work around this by blacklisting the ccp driver module for now.
>> In the mean time, we'll try to understand what is occurring here and
>> provide a fix if we can.
> A patch has been submitted which adds a command timeout and should also
> resolve this issue. Please see:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=153436754612783&w=2
>
> This patch is not yet accepted and needs adjusting when being applied to
> an older kernel (4.16 - 4.18). Once accepted, versions of the patch will
> be submitted to stable.
I applied that patch to a 4.17.17 based kernel and it works as I now get
the intended:
[ 10.207024] ccp 0000:0c:00.2: sev command 0x1 timed out, disabling PSP
[ 10.207027] ccp 0000:0c:00.2: SEV: failed to INIT error 0x0
And no more hung task during boot :)
So consider that a:
Tested-by: Thomas Backlund <tmb@...eia.org>
--
Thanks
Thomas
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom
>>
>>>
>>> [ 246.748978] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables
>>> this message.
>>> [ 246.748978] systemd-udevd D 0 724 716 0x80000124
>>> [ 246.748980] Call Trace:
>>> [ 246.748986] ? __schedule+0x234/0x840
>>> [ 246.748988] schedule+0x28/0x80
>>> [ 246.748993] __sev_do_cmd_locked+0x1f0/0x270 [ccp]
>>> [ 246.748996] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
>>> [ 246.748997] ? 0xffffffffc0683000
>>> [ 246.749001] __sev_platform_init_locked+0x2f/0x80 [ccp]
>>> [ 246.749001] ? mutex_lock+0xe/0x30
>>> [ 246.749004] sev_platform_init+0x1d/0x30 [ccp]
>>> [ 246.749007] psp_pci_init+0x40/0xe0 [ccp]
>>> [ 246.749008] ? 0xffffffffc0683000
>>> [ 246.749011] sp_mod_init+0x16/0x1000 [ccp]
>>> [ 246.749012] do_one_initcall+0x46/0x1c3
>>> [ 246.749014] ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
>>> [ 246.749017] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3a/0x170
>>> [ 246.749019] do_init_module+0x5a/0x210
>>> [ 246.749020] load_module+0x215b/0x2530
>>> [ 246.749021] ? kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x45/0x190
>>> [ 246.749024] ? vmap_page_range_noflush+0x24d/0x320
>>> [ 246.749026] ? __do_sys_init_module+0x136/0x180
>>> [ 246.749026] ? _cond_resched+0x15/0x30
>>> [ 246.749027] __do_sys_init_module+0x136/0x180
>>> [ 246.749029] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x100
>>> [ 246.749031] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>>> [ 246.749032] RIP: 0033:0x7ffb1a09018a
>>> [ 246.749033] RSP: 002b:00007ffe196680c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
>>> 00000000000000af
>>> [ 246.749034] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005562bb20d080 RCX:
>>> 00007ffb1a09018a
>>> [ 246.749034] RDX: 00007ffb1994e6f8 RSI: 0000000000029e50 RDI:
>>> 00005562bba5e710
>>> [ 246.749035] RBP: 00007ffb1994e6f8 R08: 0000000000000004 R09:
>>> 0000000000000000
>>> [ 246.749035] R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
>>> 00005562bba5e710
>>> [ 246.749036] R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 00005562bb1fde70 R15:
>>> 00005562bb20d080
>>>
>>>
>>> Should it not detect that its disabled and bail out ?
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists