[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180822073204.GC29735@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:32:04 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: PF_WQ_WORKER threads must sleep at
should_reclaim_retry().
On Wed 22-08-18 06:07:40, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/08/03 15:16, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >> Now that Roman's cgroup aware OOM killer patchset will be dropped from linux-next.git ,
> >> linux-next.git will get the sleeping point removed. Please send this patch to linux-next.git .
> >
> > I still haven't heard any explicit confirmation that the patch works for
> > your workload. Should I beg for it? Or you simply do not want to have
> > your stamp on the patch? If yes, I can live with that but this playing
> > hide and catch is not really a lot of fun.
> >
>
> I noticed that the patch has not been sent to linux-next.git yet.
> Please send to linux-next.git without my stamp on the patch.
I plan to do so after merge window closes.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists