[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180822121955.6767f8d3.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:19:55 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@...hat.com,
fiuczy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@...ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/22] guest dedicated crypto adapters
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:47:57 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Notes:
> =====
>
> Patches 1-4 (by Harald) posted with this series are forthcoming via
> Martins tree and are based on changes in the ap driver/bus that we use as a
> foundation. They have been included here because some of the functions
> in this patch series are dependent upon them.
>
> Patches 5-6 (by David) are posted with this series because they are not
> currently in our master branch. Patches 19 and 20 of this series are
> dependent upon them. I believe David's patches are available in the
> mainline now.
What's the current status of David's patches, BTW?
It's probably easiest to rebase this upon master when the patches have
hit mainline.
I don't have any comments beyond what I already wrote; we'll hopefully
be able to figure out that control domain stuff soon.
Would be great to get some LGTM from the vfio-mdev folks :)
I believe Pierre is also doing some fixing in the existing crypto vsie
code right now?
>
> This patch series works with the v6 QEMU patches. There is no new QEMU
> patchset version yet because there have been no review comments worthy of
> creating a new series; only a couple of extremely minor nits.
Probably best to repost that once the kernel part is basically through,
if just to solicit more comments.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists