linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] numa, iommu/smmu: IOMMU/SMMU driver optimization for NUMA systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ec57224a-7673-97d8-bb0c-c612080625bc@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:07:55 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "Will.Deacon@....com" <Will.Deacon@....com>,
        "gklkml16@...il.com" <gklkml16@...il.com>,
        "Tomasz.Nowicki@...ium.com" <Tomasz.Nowicki@...ium.com>,
        "Robert.Richter@...ium.com" <Robert.Richter@...ium.com>,
        "mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "jnair@...iumnetworks.com" <jnair@...iumnetworks.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        "thunder.leizhen@...wei.com" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] numa, iommu/smmu: IOMMU/SMMU driver optimization for
 NUMA systems

On 22/08/2018 15:56, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 22/08/18 14:44, John Garry wrote:
>> On 21/09/2017 09:59, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>> Adding numa aware memory allocations used for iommu dma allocation and
>>> memory allocated for SMMU stream tables, page walk tables and command
>>> queues.
>>>
>>> With this patch, iperf testing on ThunderX2, with 40G NIC card on
>>> NODE 1 PCI shown same performance(around 30% improvement) as NODE 0.
>>>
>>> Ganapatrao Kulkarni (4):
>>>   mm: move function alloc_pages_exact_nid out of __meminit
>>>   numa, iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Use NUMA aware memory allocation for smmu
>>>     translation tables
>>>   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use NUMA memory allocations for stream tables and
>>>     comamnd queues
>>>   iommu/dma, numa: Use NUMA aware memory allocations in
>>>     __iommu_dma_alloc_pages
>>>
>>>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c    | 57
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c      | 17 +++++++------
>>>  drivers/iommu/io-pgtable-arm.c |  4 ++-
>>>  include/linux/gfp.h            |  2 +-
>>>  mm/page_alloc.c                |  3 ++-
>>>  5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Hi Ganapatrao,
>>
>> Have you any plans for further work on this patchset? I have not seen
>> anything since this v1 was posted+discussed.
>

Hi Robin,

Thanks for the info. I thought I remembered 4b12 but couldn't put my 
finger on it.

> Looks like I ended up doing the version of the io-pgtable change that I
> suggested here, which was merged recently (4b123757eeaa). Patch #3
> should also be effectively obsolete now since the SWIOTLB/dma-direct
> rework (21f237e4d085). Apparently I also started reworking patch #4 in
> my tree at some point but sidelined it - I think that was at least
> partly due to another thread[1] which made it seem less clear-cut
> whether this is always the right thing to do.

Right, so #4 seems less straightforward and not directly related to 
IOMMU driver anyway.

Cheers,
John

>
> Robin.
>
> [1]
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1693026.html
>
> .
>