linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180824144810.31c929a5@bbrezillon>
Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:48:10 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>
Cc:     Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic
 NAND flash controller

On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:08:42 +0800
Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com> wrote:

> > You have to wait tWB, that's for sure.
> >   
> we have a maximum 32 commands fifo. when command is written into 
> NFC_REG_CMD, it doesn't mean that command is executing right now, maybe 
> it is buffering on the queue.Assume one ERASE operation, when 2nd 
> command(0xd0) is written into NFC_REG_CMD and then come into 
> NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR, if I read the RB status by register, it may be 
> wrong because 0xd0 may not being executed. it is unusual unless 
> buffering two many command.

You should flush the queue and wait for it to empty at the end of
->exec_op().

> so it seems that i still need to use nand_soft_waitrdy or wait cmd is 
> executed somewhere.

Don't you have a WAIT_FOR_RB instruction? What is NFC_CMD_RB for? Also,
NFC_CMD_IDLE seems to allow you to add an arbitrary delay, and that's
probably what you should use for tWB.