[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d68f13e6-339a-2a40-9c0d-7549cd9aabb3@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:46:32 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: Fix memory exposure from short TCA_U32_SEL
On 2018-08-26 5:56 p.m., Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>> We should add an nla_policy later.
>
> What's the right way to do that for cases like this?
Meant something like attached which you alluded-to in your comments
would give an upper bound (Max allowed keys is 128).
cheers,
jamal
View attachment "patchlet" of type "text/plain" (706 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists