linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] perf/x86/intel: Add support for MISPREDICT bit on Knights Landing cpus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E2734EED-2D55-473D-BE9C-BBF9D1C7D1F5@poczta.fm>
Date:   Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:50:08 +0800
From:   Jacek Tomaka <jacek.tomaka@...zta.fm>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Jacek Tomaka <jacekt@...eo.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf/x86/intel: Add support for MISPREDICT bit on Knights Landing cpus


> On 2 Aug 2018, at 6:07 pm, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> The actiual purpose of sending V4 which is identical to V3 is?
> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jacek Tomaka <jacek.tomaka@...zta.fm>
>> ---

Yes, thanks. I missed it initially, sorry.

> It's good practice to add a
> 
> V3 -> V4: changed foo
> V2 -> V3: fixed bla
> ...
> 
> section to patches which have more than one version.

Sure. Would you like me to send it for this patch as well? 

Regards.
Jacek Tomaka