[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUoNdwDuNSHb3haw9-fYk+sNC_M4r+5EMVVzJ8HWeSsOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:58:40 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Adin Scannell <ascannell@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: TLB flushes on fixmap changes
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
>> What do you all think?
>
> I agree in general. But I think that current->mm would need to be loaded, as
> otherwise I am afraid it would break switch_mm_irqs_off().
>
What breaks?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists