[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <823D916E-4056-4A36-BDD8-0FB682A8DCAE@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:10:34 -0700
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Adin Scannell <ascannell@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: TLB flushes on fixmap changes
at 11:58 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
>>> What do you all think?
>>
>> I agree in general. But I think that current->mm would need to be loaded, as
>> otherwise I am afraid it would break switch_mm_irqs_off().
>
> What breaks?
Actually nothing. I just saw the IBPB stuff regarding tsk, but it should not
matter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists