[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a8594a1c-0d10-74c6-0e40-15d49ff876a3@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:14:00 -0700
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, david.brown@...aro.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
andy.gross@...aro.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
On 08/28/2018 11:48 AM, Li Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:57 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
>> convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
>
> Please forgive my ignorance, but what is this format specifier do
> exactly? I cannot find anything listed in the printf specification
> matching this. Is this something newly introduced?
>
> Leo
>
>From Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst:
kobjects
--------
::
%pOF[fnpPcCF]
For printing kobject based structs (device nodes). Default behaviour is
equivalent to %pOFf.
- f - device node full_name
- n - device node name
- p - device node phandle
- P - device node path spec (name + @unit)
- F - device node flags
- c - major compatible string
- C - full compatible string
-Tyrel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists