[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180828171158.GB10879@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:11:58 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: sibis@...eaurora.org
Cc: bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
ohad@...ery.com, mark.rutland@....com, sricharan@...eaurora.org,
akdwived@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
tsoni@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: reset: Add PDC Global binding for
SDM845 SoCs
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:38:26AM +0530, sibis@...eaurora.org wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> Thanks for the review
>
> On 2018-08-28 06:08, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Hi Sibi,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:48:55PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > > Add PDC Global(Power Domain Controller) binding for SDM845 SoCs.
> >
> > nit: missing blank before the opening parenthesis.
> >
>
> Will fix it
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/reset/qcom,pdc-global.txt | 52
> > > +++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/dt-bindings/reset/qcom,sdm845-pdc.h | 20 +++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,pdc-global.txt
> > > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/qcom,sdm845-pdc.h
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,pdc-global.txt
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,pdc-global.txt
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..69f9edca9503
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/qcom,pdc-global.txt
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> > > +PDC Global
> > > +======================================
> > > +
> > > +This binding describes a reset-controller found on PDC-Global(Power
> > > Domain
> > > +Controller) block for Qualcomm Technologies Inc SDM845 SoCs.
> >
> > Are there other PDC reset controllers that aren't 'global'? Otherwise
> > I'd suggest to use 'pdc-reset' instead of 'pdc-global', which is more
> > specific and in line with the name of the driver added by this series.
> > Or something like 'pdc-reset-global/main' if there are other
> > controllers?
> >
>
> These are the only reset lines found in the pdc-global register space. But
> as
> explained by Bjorn, wouldn't it be better to leave it as such since
> pdc-global
> best describes the hardware without being limited by the current
> functionality
> it is being used for?
If I understand Bjorn's reply on
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10575335/ correctly it is planned
to use the 'pdc-global' compatible string in the future in some sort
of MFD driver for the 'PDC Global' IP block, which then instantiates
other drivers like the reset controller. In this case I agree that
'pdc-global' seems a reasonable choice.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists