[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180828173951.GB20375@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:39:52 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: fix spelling mistake "cylic" ->
"cyclic"
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 12:22:35PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in pr_err error message
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Given that this is part of an error message, I agree it's worth fixing.
Will
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
> index 5b915b370d5a..0be047dbd897 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int __test_cycle(unsigned int nthreads)
> if (!cycle->result)
> continue;
>
> - pr_err("cylic deadlock not resolved, ret[%d/%d] = %d\n",
> + pr_err("cyclic deadlock not resolved, ret[%d/%d] = %d\n",
> n, nthreads, cycle->result);
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists