[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADRPPNRvRKEuV=ZzH6yq6_7COvFSWy2ibAKoEt4YrzES2m9x2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:48:01 -0500
From: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhao Qiang <qiang.zhao@....com>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
thierry.reding@...il.com, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:57 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
> convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
Please forgive my ignorance, but what is this format specifier do
exactly? I cannot find anything listed in the printf specification
matching this. Is this something newly introduced?
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists