[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180829093121.GQ24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 11:31:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Delete unnecesary #include
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:33:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Commit c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and u
> nify their usage") added the inclusion of <trace/events/preemptirq.h>.
> liblockdep doesn't have a stub version of that header so now fails to
> build.
>
> However, commit bff1b208a5d1 ("tracing: Partial revert of "tracing:
> Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage"") removed the
> use of functions declared in that header. So delete the #include.
>
> Fixes: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints ...")
> Fixes: bff1b208a5d1 ("tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize ...")
There's no actual breakage because of this extra include, is there?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists