[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180829094951.2d88cb75@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:49:51 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Delete unnecesary #include
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 11:31:21 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:33:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Commit c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and u
> > nify their usage") added the inclusion of <trace/events/preemptirq.h>.
> > liblockdep doesn't have a stub version of that header so now fails to
> > build.
> >
> > However, commit bff1b208a5d1 ("tracing: Partial revert of "tracing:
> > Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage"") removed the
> > use of functions declared in that header. So delete the #include.
> >
> > Fixes: c3bc8fd637a9 ("tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints ...")
> > Fixes: bff1b208a5d1 ("tracing: Partial revert of "tracing: Centralize ...")
>
> There's no actual breakage because of this extra include, is there?
I believe the user tool in tools/lib/lockdep fails because of it.
Although, I just tried building it myself, and it fails because of
nmi.h header file.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists