Message-ID: <20180829165058.GR2960@e110439-lin>
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 17:50:58 +0100
From:   Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To:     Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        chris.redpath@....com, valentin.schneider@....com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
        skannan@...eaurora.org, pkondeti@...eaurora.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, edubezval@...il.com,
        srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, currojerez@...eup.net,
        javi.merino@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/14] sched/topology: Introduce sched_energy_present
 static key

Hi Quentin,
a couple of minor notes/questions follow...

Best,
Patrick

On 20-Aug 10:44, Quentin Perret wrote:
> In order to ensure a minimal performance impact on non-energy-aware
> systems, introduce a static_key guarding the access to Energy-Aware
> Scheduling (EAS) code.
> 
> The static key is set iff all the following conditions are met for at
> least one root domain:
>   1. all online CPUs of the root domain are covered by the Energy
>      Model (EM);
>   2. the complexity of the root domain's EM is low enough to keep
>      scheduling overheads low;
>   3. the root domain has an asymmetric CPU capacity topology (detected
>      by looking for the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag in the sched_domain
>      hierarchy).
> 
> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/sched.h    |  1 +
>  kernel/sched/topology.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 4b884e467545..cb3d6afdb114 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1421,6 +1421,7 @@ static const_debug __maybe_unused unsigned int sysctl_sched_features =
>  
>  extern struct static_key_false sched_numa_balancing;
>  extern struct static_key_false sched_schedstats;
> +extern struct static_key_false sched_energy_present;
>  
>  static inline u64 global_rt_period(void)
>  {
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 4c6a36a8d7b8..1cb86a0ef00f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,14 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent)
>  
>  	return 1;
>  }
> +/*
> + * This static_key is set if at least one root domain meets all the following
> + * conditions:
> + *    1. all CPUs of the root domain are covered by the EM;
> + *    2. the EM complexity is low enough to keep scheduling overheads low;
> + *    3. the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag is set in the sched_domain hierarchy.
> + */
> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_energy_present);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
>  static void free_pd(struct perf_domain *pd)
> @@ -270,12 +278,34 @@ static void destroy_perf_domain_rcu(struct rcu_head *rp)
>  	free_pd(pd);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * The complexity of the Energy Model is defined as: nr_pd * (nr_cpus + nr_cs)
> + * with: 'nr_pd' the number of performance domains; 'nr_cpus' the number of
> + * CPUs; and 'nr_cs' the sum of the capacity states numbers of all performance
> + * domains.
> + *
> + * It is generally not a good idea to use such a model in the wake-up path on
> + * very complex platforms because of the associated scheduling overheads. The
> + * arbitrary constraint below prevents that. It makes EAS usable up to 16 CPUs
> + * with per-CPU DVFS and less than 8 capacity states each, for example.

According to the formula above, that should give a "complexity value" of:

  16 * (16 + 9) = 384

while, 2K complexity seems more like a 40xCPUs system with 8 OPPs.

Maybe we should update either the example or the constant below ?

> + */
> +#define EM_MAX_COMPLEXITY 2048
> +
>  static void build_perf_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
>  {
> +	int i, nr_pd = 0, nr_cs = 0, nr_cpus = cpumask_weight(cpu_map);
>  	struct perf_domain *pd = NULL, *tmp;
>  	int cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_map);
>  	struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(cpu)->rd;
> -	int i;
> +
> +	/* EAS is enabled for asymmetric CPU capacity topologies. */
> +	if (!per_cpu(sd_asym_cpucapacity, cpu)) {
> +		if (sched_debug()) {
> +			pr_info("rd %*pbl: CPUs do not have asymmetric capacities\n",
> +					cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map));
> +		}
> +		goto free;
> +	}
>  
>  	for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map) {
>  		/* Skip already covered CPUs. */
> @@ -288,6 +318,21 @@ static void build_perf_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
>  			goto free;
>  		tmp->next = pd;
>  		pd = tmp;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Count performance domains and capacity states for the
> +		 * complexity check.
> +		 */
> +		nr_pd++;

A special case where EAS is not going to be used is for systems where
nr_pd matches the number of online CPUs, isn't it ?

If that's the case, then, by caching this nr_pd you can probably check
this condition in the sched_energy_start() and bail out even faster by
avoiding to scan all the doms_new's pd ?


> +		nr_cs += em_pd_nr_cap_states(pd->obj);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Bail out if the Energy Model complexity is too high. */
> +	if (nr_pd * (nr_cs + nr_cpus) > EM_MAX_COMPLEXITY) {
> +		if (sched_debug())
> +			pr_info("rd %*pbl: EM complexity is too high\n ",
> +						cpumask_pr_args(cpu_map));
> +		goto free;
>  	}
>  
>  	perf_domain_debug(cpu_map, pd);
> @@ -307,6 +352,35 @@ static void build_perf_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
>  	if (tmp)
>  		call_rcu(&tmp->rcu, destroy_perf_domain_rcu);
>  }
> +
> +static void sched_energy_start(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[])
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * The conditions for EAS to start are checked during the creation of
> +	 * root domains. If one of them meets all conditions, it will have a
> +	 * non-null list of performance domains.
> +	 */
> +	while (ndoms_new) {
> +		if (cpu_rq(cpumask_first(doms_new[ndoms_new - 1]))->rd->pd)
> +			goto enable;
> +		ndoms_new--;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_energy_present)) {
                          ^^^^^^^^
Is this defined unlikely to reduce overheads on systems which never
satisfy all the conditions above while still rebuild SDs from time to
time ?

> +		if (sched_debug())
> +			pr_info("%s: stopping EAS\n", __func__);
> +		static_branch_disable_cpuslocked(&sched_energy_present);
> +	}
> +
> +	return;
> +
> +enable:
> +	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sched_energy_present)) {
> +		if (sched_debug())
> +			pr_info("%s: starting EAS\n", __func__);
> +		static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&sched_energy_present);
> +	}
> +}
>  #else
>  static void free_pd(struct perf_domain *pd) { }
>  #endif
> @@ -2123,6 +2197,7 @@ void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
>  match3:
>  		;
>  	}
> +	sched_energy_start(ndoms_new, doms_new);
>  #endif
>  
>  	/* Remember the new sched domains: */
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists