[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180829203547.15650-8-johnfwhitmore@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:35:33 +0100
From: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/21] staging:rtl8192u: Rename TxSTBC - Style
Rename the bitfield member TxSTBC. As it stands the name causes a
checkpatch issue due to its use of CamelCase naming style. Because
the member is not actually used in the code the name has been changed
to 'not_used_tx_stbc'. The two lines of code, one for initialisation
and one for debug logging have been removed.
This is a coding style change which should have no impact on runtime
code execution.
Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h | 2 +-
drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
index 23f8ee39e32d..ab61c9e81c2c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ struct ht_capability_ele {
u8 not_used_green_field:1;
u8 short_gi20_mhz:1;
u8 short_gi40_mhz:1;
- u8 TxSTBC:1;
+ u8 not_used_tx_stbc:1;
u8 RxSTBC:2;
u8 DelayBA:1;
u8 MaxAMSDUSize:1;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c
index 54c56cec612f..65c377094278 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c
@@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ void HTDebugHTCapability(u8 *CapIE, u8 *TitleString)
IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "\tSupported Channel Width = %s\n", (pCapELE->chl_width) ? "20MHz" : "20/40MHz");
IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "\tSupport Short GI for 20M = %s\n", (pCapELE->short_gi20_mhz) ? "YES" : "NO");
IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "\tSupport Short GI for 40M = %s\n", (pCapELE->short_gi40_mhz) ? "YES" : "NO");
- IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "\tSupport TX STBC = %s\n", (pCapELE->TxSTBC) ? "YES" : "NO");
IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "\tMax AMSDU Size = %s\n", (pCapELE->MaxAMSDUSize) ? "3839" : "7935");
IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "\tSupport CCK in 20/40 mode = %s\n", (pCapELE->DssCCk) ? "YES" : "NO");
IEEE80211_DEBUG(IEEE80211_DL_HT, "\tMax AMPDU Factor = %d\n", pCapELE->MaxRxAMPDUFactor);
@@ -561,7 +560,6 @@ void HTConstructCapabilityElement(struct ieee80211_device *ieee, u8 *posHTCap, u
pCapELE->short_gi40_mhz = 1; // We can receive Short GI!!
//DbgPrint("TX HT cap/info ele BW=%d SG20=%d SG40=%d\n\r",
//pCapELE->chl_width, pCapELE->short_gi20_mhz, pCapELE->short_gi40_mhz);
- pCapELE->TxSTBC = 1;
pCapELE->RxSTBC = 0;
pCapELE->DelayBA = 0; // Do not support now!!
pCapELE->MaxAMSDUSize = (MAX_RECEIVE_BUFFER_SIZE >= 7935) ? 1 : 0;
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists