[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180830143738.GC11544@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:37:38 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
jason@...edaemon.net, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
dmitriy@...-tech.org, jeremy.linton@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, atish.patra@....com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] RISC-V: Provide a cleaner raw_smp_processor_id()
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:42:36AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> +/* Obtains the hart ID of the currently executing task. This relies on
> + * THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK, but we define that unconditionally. */
Kernel comment style would be:
/*
* Obtains the hart ID of the currently executing task. This relies on
* THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK, but we define that unconditionally.
*/
> +#ifdef CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is always defined for riscv, so no need for this
ifdef.
> +#define get_ti() ((struct thread_info *)get_current())
> +#define raw_smp_processor_id() (get_ti()->cpu)
Please don't cast structs around. This should be something like
#define raw_smp_processor_id() \
(container_of(get_current(), struct task_struct, thread_info)->cpu)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists