[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180830144010.GE11544@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:40:10 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
jason@...edaemon.net, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
dmitriy@...-tech.org, jeremy.linton@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, atish.patra@....com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] RISC-V: Rename riscv_of_processor_hart to
riscv_of_processor_hartid
> +/* Returns the hart ID of the given device tree node, or -1 if the device tree
> + * node isn't a RISC-V hart. */
In addition to the comment formatting: we usually keep the description
near the implementation, not the header. It could also become a
kerneldoc comment for added clarity.
> +extern int riscv_of_processor_hartid(struct device_node *node);
No need to declare function prototypes in headers with the extern
attribute, btw.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists