[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9eb96e7-3846-1aaa-d257-895ca142b1ef@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:54:30 +0000
From: Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
John Allen <jallen@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 0/6] mm: online/offline_pages called w.o.
mem_hotplug_lock
On 8/30/18 8:31 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 21.08.2018 12:44, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> This is the same approach as in the first RFC, but this time without
>> exporting device_hotplug_lock (requested by Greg) and with some more
>> details and documentation regarding locking. Tested only on x86 so far.
>>
>
> I'll be on vacation for two weeks starting on Saturday. If there are no
> comments I'll send this as !RFC once I return.
>
I am studying this series, will send my comments later today.
Pavel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists