[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30229ef5-ce4e-e78b-32f9-7c563f63827b@wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:11:11 -0700
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc: "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"dmitriy@...-tech.org" <dmitriy@...-tech.org>,
"jeremy.linton@....com" <jeremy.linton@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] RISC-V: Rename im_okay_therefore_i_am to
found_boot_cpu
On 8/30/18 7:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> struct device_node *dn = NULL;
>> - int hart, im_okay_therefore_i_am = 0;
>> + int hart, found_boot_cpu = 0;
>
> If you rename this anyway please switch to use a bool.
>
I can address the comment on this patch and fold it in my series to
avoid unnecessary conflict.
@Palmer: You can drop this patch.
Regards,
Atish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists