lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:40:12 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/52] Remove rcu_state pointers for v4.20/v5.0 On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:10:06 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > I would just keep the documentation patches separate. > > Combining yours and Josh's feedback, I will split the documentation > updates out of 4ca0508f7870 ("rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_node tree > accessor macros") and put them into the "doc" series. Possibly combining > it with 2ea66b6fce61 ("doc: Update documentation for removal of RCU-bh > update machinery") and/or 3f38a4626202 ("doc: Update documentation for > removal of RCU-sched update machinery"). Left to myself, I would merge > it in to the merger of those two documentation commits. Having them > together is probably more convenient anyway, as it would provide a > summary of the entire RCU-flavor-consolidation change. > > Fair enough? > Go for it ;-) -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists