linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/52] Remove rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180830182611.GM4225@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:26:11 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/52] Remove rcu_state pointers for
 v4.20/v5.0

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:40:12PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:10:06 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > > I would just keep the documentation patches separate.  
> > 
> > Combining yours and Josh's feedback, I will split the documentation
> > updates out of 4ca0508f7870 ("rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_node tree
> > accessor macros") and put them into the "doc" series.  Possibly combining
> > it with 2ea66b6fce61 ("doc: Update documentation for removal of RCU-bh
> > update machinery") and/or 3f38a4626202 ("doc: Update documentation for
> > removal of RCU-sched update machinery").  Left to myself, I would merge
> > it in to the merger of those two documentation commits.  Having them
> > together is probably more convenient anyway, as it would provide a
> > summary of the entire RCU-flavor-consolidation change.
> > 
> > Fair enough?
> 
> Go for it ;-)

Done!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul