linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] block: Add PCI P2P flag for request queue and check support for requests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:17:40 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] block: Add PCI P2P flag for request queue and
 check support for requests



On 30/08/18 01:11 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/30/18 12:53 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> QUEUE_FLAG_PCI_P2P is introduced meaning a driver's request queue
>> supports targeting P2P memory.
>>
>> When a request is submitted we check if PCI P2PDMA memory is assigned
>> to the first page in the bio. If it is, we ensure the queue it's
>> submitted to supports it, and enforce REQ_NOMERGE.
> 
> I think this belongs in the caller - both the validity check, and
> passing in NOMERGE for this type of request. I don't want to impose
> this overhead on everything, for a pretty niche case.

Well, the point was to prevent driver writers from doing the wrong
thing. The WARN_ON would be a bit pointless in the driver if we rely on
the driver to either do the right thing or add the WARN_ON themselves.

If I'm going to change anything I'd drop the warning entirely and move
the NO_MERGE back into the caller...

Note: the check will be compiled out if the kernel does not support PCI P2P.

Logan