linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/23] wireless: remove unnecessary unlikely()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <814defe0-72ab-049b-97cb-f295f4964895@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:44:52 +0300
From:   Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>,
        Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/23] wireless: remove unnecessary unlikely()



On 31/08/18 12:52, Kalle Valo wrote:
> + linux-wireless

> IMHO you could fold patches 10, 11 and 12 into one to avoid having three
> patches with duplicate titles. Or alternatively use proper driver
> prefixes like "ath10k:", "b43:" and so on.

I was wondering if it would be ok to fold them, but it's easier to fold 
than to split, so I started with 3

> But how do you want these to be applied? For the wireless patches you
> didn't Cc linux-wireless so our patchwork won't see them and hence I
> can't take them. So if you want me to take these, please resend and
> include linux-wireless.


ok, I was hoping to avoid joining the ml but it's done
I had patches for about 20 different trees, so I decided to first see if 
the patches could be taken in right away.
In at least one case (pinctrl) I got lucky :-)

--
thanks, igor