[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9452ee6c-e989-d178-cd51-f29782ad9b31@deltatee.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:11:48 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] PCI/P2PDMA: Add P2P DMA driver writer's
documentation
On 31/08/18 11:38 AM, Christian König wrote:
> If you can separate out adding the detection I can take a look adding
> this with my DMA-buf P2P efforts.
Oh, maybe my previous email wasn't clear, but I'd say that detection is
already separate from ZONE_DEVICE. Nothing really needs to be changed.
I just think you'll probably want to write you're own function similar
to pci_p2pdma_distance that perhaps just takes two pci_devs instead of
the list of clients as is needed by nvme-of-like users.
To enable a whitelist we just have to handle the case where
upstream_bridge_distance() returns -1 and check if the devices are in
the same root complex with supported root ports before deciding the
transaction is not supported.
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists