[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180901082703.GA670@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2018 10:27:03 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/13] PCI/P2PDMA: Support peer-to-peer memory
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:48:40AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Pretty easy. P2P detection is pretty much just pci_p2pdma_distance() ,
> which has nothing to do with the ZONE_DEVICE support.
>
> (And the distance function makes use of a number of static functions
> which could be combined into a simpler interface, should we need it.)
I'd ѕay lets get things merged as-is, so that we can review the
non-ZONE_DEVICE users. I'm a little curious how that is going to work,
so having it as a full series would be useful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists