| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a00c1650b69ba85bed7ae39b81a0c40f@agner.ch>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 11:32:18 -0700
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, airlied@...ux.ie, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
fabio.estevam@....com, linux-imx@....com, architt@...eaurora.org,
a.hajda@...sung.com, gustavo@...ovan.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, sean@...rly.run,
marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com, max.krummenacher@...adex.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/bridge: use bus flags in bridge timings
On 05.09.2018 00:44, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 10:06:28 EEST Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 08:21:08 EEST Stefan Agner wrote:
>> > The DRM bus flags convey additional information on pixel data on
>> > the bus. All current available bus flags might be of interest for
>> > a bridge. Remove the sampling_edge field and use bus_flags.
>> >
>> > In the case at hand a dumb VGA bridge needs a specific data enable
>> > polarity (DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_LOW).
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dumb-vga-dac.c | 6 +++---
>> > include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 11 +++++------
>> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dumb-vga-dac.c
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dumb-vga-dac.c index 9b706789a341..7a5c24967115
>> > 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dumb-vga-dac.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dumb-vga-dac.c
>> > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int dumb_vga_remove(struct platform_device
>> > *pdev) */
>> >
>> > static const struct drm_bridge_timings default_dac_timings = {
>> >
>> > /* Timing specifications, datasheet page 7 */
>> >
>> > - .sampling_edge = DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE,
>> > + .bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE,
>> >
>> > .setup_time_ps = 500,
>> > .hold_time_ps = 1500,
>> >
>> > };
>> >
>> > @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_timings
>> > default_dac_timings = { */
>> >
>> > static const struct drm_bridge_timings ti_ths8134_dac_timings = {
>> >
>> > /* From timing diagram, datasheet page 9 */
>> >
>> > - .sampling_edge = DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE,
>> > + .bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE,
>> >
>> > /* From datasheet, page 12 */
>> > .setup_time_ps = 3000,
>> > /* I guess this means latched input */
>> >
>> > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_timings
>> > ti_ths8134_dac_timings = { */
>> >
>> > static const struct drm_bridge_timings ti_ths8135_dac_timings = {
>> >
>> > /* From timing diagram, datasheet page 14 */
>> >
>> > - .sampling_edge = DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE,
>> > + .bus_flags = DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE,
>> >
>> > /* From datasheet, page 16 */
>> > .setup_time_ps = 2000,
>> > .hold_time_ps = 500,
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
>> > index bd850747ce54..85d4b51eae19 100644
>> > --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
>> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
>> > @@ -244,14 +244,13 @@ struct drm_bridge_funcs {
>> >
>> > */
>> >
>> > struct drm_bridge_timings {
>> >
>> > /**
>> >
>> > - * @sampling_edge:
>> >
>> > + * @bus_flags:
>> > *
>> >
>> > - * Tells whether the bridge samples the digital input signal
>> > - * from the display engine on the positive or negative edge of the
>> > - * clock, this should reuse the DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_[POS|NEG]EDGE
>> > - * bitwise flags from the DRM connector (bit 2 and 3 valid).
>> > + * Tells what additional settings for the pixel data on the bus
>> > + * this bridge requires (like pixel signal polarity). See also
>> > + * &drm_display_info->bus_flags.
>> >
>> > */
>> >
>> > - u32 sampling_edge;
>> > + u32 bus_flags;
>>
>> While I'm not opposed to extending the bridge structure to allow specifying
>> other flags, I think we're losing information here. The sampling_edge field
>> makes it clear that the DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_(NEG|POS)EDGE flags specified
>> on which clock edge signals are sampled. bus_flags could be interpreted
>> differently, for instance as specifying on which clock edge signals are
>> output on the other side of the bridge.
Good point! I actually really don't like that we use the same flags here
but from a different perspective. Especially since the flags defines
document things differently:
/* drive data on pos. edge */
#define DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE (1<<2)
/* drive data on neg. edge */
#define DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE (1<<3)
Using the opposite perspective would also need translation in crtc
drivers... So far no driver uses sampling_edge.
I would prefer if we always use the meaning as documented by the flags.
I guess we would need to convert DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE ->
DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE.
Linus Walleij, you added sampling edge, any thoughts?
>>
>> We could easily fix this by specifying that the bus_flags field refers to
>> the input side of the bridge. We could also rename the field to
>> input_bus_flags. The rename could be delayed until needed, but that would
>> result in yet another change to all bridge drivers, so we may want to do it
>> now as your patch touches all the drivers already. Other options might also
>> be possible.
Naming the field input_bus_flags seems very sensible. How about:
struct drm_bridge_timings {
/**
* @input_bus_flags:
*
* Specifies the settings for the pixel data on the input
* bus of this bridge (like pixel signal polarity). Note the
* flags are typically controller centric! See also
* &drm_display_info->bus_flags.
*/
u32 input_bus_flags;
>
> And I should of course make sure to wake up before reviewing patches.
> Obviously only one driver is currently affected by the rename. More will use
> the flags later though, so the argument could still hold.
It is only one bridge driver making use of bridge timings. As far as I
can see currently no driver actually makes use of the bridge timings
sampling_edge currently...
But yes, agreed, we should make a sensible choice now to avoid churn
down the line.
--
Stefan
>
>> > /**
>> >
>> > * @setup_time_ps:
>> > *
Powered by blists - more mailing lists