linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] seccomp: remove unnecessary unlikely()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1809061008210.23269@namei.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:08:30 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc:     Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com>,
        Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: remove unnecessary unlikely()

On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Kees Cook wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 06/09/18 01:23, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> >> Should I take this, or is it part of your series going somewhere else?
> >
> >
> > It turned out it doesn't really work to have a generic series against 20
> > trees :-/
> 
> I know that pain very well!
> 
> > I'm submitting them individually to each subsystem.
> > So this one is just for security.
> 
> Sounds good.
> 
> James, can you take this directly, or would you prefer a pull request from me?

I'll take it with your ack.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>