linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] seccomp: remove unnecessary unlikely()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJKovNX9SMEPrawx=BqzkPHXay-WSfidQF830hqAGZ-eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:13:05 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:     Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com>,
        Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: remove unnecessary unlikely()

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:08 PM, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 06/09/18 01:23, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >
>> >> Should I take this, or is it part of your series going somewhere else?
>> >
>> >
>> > It turned out it doesn't really work to have a generic series against 20
>> > trees :-/
>>
>> I know that pain very well!
>>
>> > I'm submitting them individually to each subsystem.
>> > So this one is just for security.
>>
>> Sounds good.
>>
>> James, can you take this directly, or would you prefer a pull request from me?
>
> I'll take it with your ack.

Already included! :) (This was a v2, split from a separate series, so
Igor already included my Ack from the other thread.)

But, for completeness:

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security