linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: add NUMA emulation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 16:30:59 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
        sudeep.holla@....com, ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: add NUMA emulation support

On 09/07/2018 02:34 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 06-09-18 15:53:34, Shuah Khan wrote:
> [...]
>> A few critical allocations could be satisfied and root cgroup prevails. It is not the
>> intent to have exclusivity at the expense of the kernel.
> 
> Well, it is not "few critical allocations". It can be a lot of
> memory. Basically any GFP_KERNEL allocation. So how exactly you expect
> this to work when you cannot estimate how much
> memory will kernel eat?
> 
>>
>> This feature will allow a way to configure cpusets on non-NUMA for workloads that can
>> benefit from the reservation and isolation that is available within the constraints of
>> exclusive cpuset policies.
> 
> AFAIR this was the first approach Google took for the memory isolation
> and they moved over to memory cgroups. 

In addition to isolation, being able to reserve a block instead is one of the
issues I am looking to address. Unfortunately memory cgroups won't address that
issue.

I would recommend to talk to
> those guys bebfore you introduce potentially a lot of code that will not
> really work for the workload you indend it for.
> 

Will you be able to point me to a good contact at Goggle and/or some pointers
on finding discussion on the memory isolation. My searches on lkml came up
short,

thanks,
-- Shuah