[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180907223129.71994-1-vnagarnaik@google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:31:29 -0700
From: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>, jbehmer@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Allow for rescheduling when removing pages
When reducing ring buffer size, pages are removed by scheduling a work
item on each CPU for the corresponding CPU ring buffer. After the pages
are removed from ring buffer linked list, the pages are free()d in a
tight loop. The loop does not give up CPU until all pages are removed.
In a worst case behavior, when lot of pages are to be freed, it can
cause system stall.
After the pages are removed from the list, the free() can happen while
the work is rescheduled. Call cond_resched() in the loop to prevent the
system hangup.
Reported-by: Jason Behmer <jbehmer@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 1d92d4a982fd..65bd4616220d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1546,6 +1546,8 @@ rb_remove_pages(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer, unsigned long nr_pages)
tmp_iter_page = first_page;
do {
+ cond_resched();
+
to_remove_page = tmp_iter_page;
rb_inc_page(cpu_buffer, &tmp_iter_page);
--
2.19.0.rc2.392.g5ba43deb5a-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists