lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:42:51 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com> Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: fix interrupt transfer error happened on MTK platforms On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 03:29:12PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote: > The MTK xHCI controller use some reserved bytes in endpoint context for > bandwidth scheduling, so need keep them in xhci_endpoint_copy(); If they are "reserved" shouldn't they be properly named? And by using reserved bytes, isn't that a spec violation? thanks, greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists