linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: fix interrupt transfer error happened on MTK platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180907074251.GA2079@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:42:51 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: fix interrupt transfer error happened on
 MTK platforms

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 03:29:12PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> The MTK xHCI controller use some reserved bytes in endpoint context for
> bandwidth scheduling, so need keep them in xhci_endpoint_copy();

If they are "reserved" shouldn't they be properly named?  And by using
reserved bytes, isn't that a spec violation?

thanks,

greg k-h