linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: fix interrupt transfer error happened on MTK platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 16:43:46 +0800
From:   Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: xhci: fix interrupt transfer error happened on
 MTK platforms

Hi,

On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 09:42 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 03:29:12PM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > The MTK xHCI controller use some reserved bytes in endpoint context for
> > bandwidth scheduling, so need keep them in xhci_endpoint_copy();
> 
> If they are "reserved" shouldn't they be properly named?  And by using
> reserved bytes, isn't that a spec violation?
It indeed violates the spec, "they shall be treated by system software
as Reserved and Opaque", and it's a quirk of the MTK xHCI controller.

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h