| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AM5PR0402MB2865730C24CDCC90DCD8A438F1000@AM5PR0402MB2865.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:32:30 +0000
From: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
To: "Wang, Dongsheng" <dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver
Hi Dongsheng,
On 2018/9/5 10:58, Dongsheng Wang wrote:
>
> Please change your comments style.
>
> On 2018/8/31 11:56, Ran Wang wrote:
> > The NXP's QorIQ Processors based on ARM Core have RCPM module (Run
> > Control and Power Management), which performs all device-level tasks
> > associated with power management such as wakeup source control.
> >
> > This driver depends on FSL platform PM driver framework which help to
> > isolate user and PM service provider (such as RCPM driver).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chenhui Zhao <chenhui.zhao@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <ying.zhang22455@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig | 6 ++
> > drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c | 153
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode
> > 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig index
> > 6517412..882330d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
> > @@ -30,3 +30,9 @@ config FSL_PLAT_PM
> > have to know the implement details of wakeup function it require.
> > Besides, it is also easy for service side to upgrade its logic when
> > design changed and remain user side unchanged.
> > +
> > +config LS_RCPM
> > + bool "Freescale RCPM support"
> > + depends on (FSL_PLAT_PM)
> > + help
> > + This feature is to enable specified wakeup source for system sleep.
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile b/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile index
> > 8f9db23..43ff71a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
> > @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QUICC_ENGINE) += qe/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CPM) += qe/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_GUTS) += guts.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_PLAT_PM) += plat_pm.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_LS_RCPM) += ls-rcpm.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c new
> > file mode 100644 index 0000000..b0feb88
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +//
> > +// plat_pm.c - Freescale Layerscape RCPM driver // // Copyright 2018
> > +NXP // // Author: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>,
> > +
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <soc/fsl/plat_pm.h>
> > +
> > +#define MAX_COMPATIBLE_NUM 10
> > +
> > +struct rcpm_t {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + void __iomem *ippdexpcr_addr;
> > + bool big_endian; /* Big/Little endian of RCPM module */
> > +};
> > +
> > +// rcpm_handle - Configure RCPM reg according to wake up source
> > +request // @user_dev: pointer to user's device struct // @flag: to
> > +enable(true) or disable(false) wakeup source // @handle_priv: pointer
> > +to struct rcpm_t instance // // Return 0 on success other negative
> > +errno static int rcpm_handle(struct device *user_dev, bool flag, void
> > +*handle_priv) {
> > + struct rcpm_t *rcpm;
> > + bool big_endian;
> > + const char *dev_compatible_array[MAX_COMPATIBLE_NUM];
> > + void __iomem *ippdexpcr_addr;
> > + u32 ippdexpcr;
> > + u32 set_bit;
> > + int ret, num, i;
> > +
> > + rcpm = handle_priv;
> > + big_endian = rcpm->big_endian;
> > + ippdexpcr_addr = rcpm->ippdexpcr_addr;
> > +
> > + num = device_property_read_string_array(user_dev, "compatible",
> > + dev_compatible_array, MAX_COMPATIBLE_NUM);
> > + if (num < 0)
> > + return num;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> > + if (!device_property_present(rcpm->dev,
> > + dev_compatible_array[i]))
> > + continue;
> > + else {
> Remove this else.
Got it! Will update in next version.
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(rcpm->dev,
> > + dev_compatible_array[i], &set_bit);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (!device_property_present(rcpm->dev,
> > + dev_compatible_array[i]))
> This has been checked. Continue ? or return ENODEV？
Yes, this checking is not necessary, will remove in next version
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + else {
> Remove this else.
OK
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(rcpm->dev,
> > + dev_compatible_array[i],
> &set_bit);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (big_endian)
> > + ippdexpcr =
> ioread32be(ippdexpcr_addr);
> > + else
> > + ippdexpcr =
> ioread32(ippdexpcr_addr);
> > +
> > + if (flag)
> > + ippdexpcr |= set_bit;
> > + else
> > + ippdexpcr &= ~set_bit;
> > +
> > + if (big_endian) {
> > + iowrite32be(ippdexpcr,
> ippdexpcr_addr);
> > + ippdexpcr =
> ioread32be(ippdexpcr_addr);
> > + } else
> if (x) {
> ....
> ....
> } else {
>
> }
Got it!
> > + iowrite32(ippdexpcr, ippdexpcr_addr);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ls_rcpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > + struct resource *r;
> > + struct rcpm_t *rcpm;
> > +
> > + r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + if (!r)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + rcpm = kmalloc(sizeof(*rcpm), GFP_KERNEL);
> kzalloc is better.
OK
> > + if (!rcpm)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + rcpm->big_endian = device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev,
> > +"big-endian");
> > +
> > + rcpm->ippdexpcr_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> > + if (IS_ERR(rcpm->ippdexpcr_addr))
> > + return PTR_ERR(rcpm->ippdexpcr_addr);
> > +
> > + rcpm->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rcpm);
> > +
> > + return register_fsl_platform_wakeup_source(rcpm_handle, rcpm); }
> > +
> > +static int ls_rcpm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > + struct rcpm_t *rcpm;
> Not need a table.
OK, thanks for your careful review.
Regards,
Ran
> Cheers,
> -Dongsheng
>
> > +
> > + rcpm = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > + deregister_fsl_platform_wakeup_source(rcpm);
> > + kfree(rcpm);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id ls_rcpm_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "fsl,qoriq-rcpm-2.1", },
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ls_rcpm_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver ls_rcpm_driver = {
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "ls-rcpm",
> > + .of_match_table = ls_rcpm_of_match,
> > + },
> > + .probe = ls_rcpm_probe,
> > + .remove = ls_rcpm_remove,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init ls_rcpm_init(void)
> > +{
> > + return platform_driver_register(&ls_rcpm_driver);
> > +}
> > +subsys_initcall(ls_rcpm_init);
> > +
> > +static void __exit ls_rcpm_exit(void) {
> > + platform_driver_unregister(&ls_rcpm_driver);
> > +}
> > +module_exit(ls_rcpm_exit);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists