linux-kernel - Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <11959.1536420266@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 08 Sep 2018 16:24:26 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept

Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:

> > > Looks like next-20180906 now has a regression where mounting
> > > root won't work with commit fd0002870b45 ("vfs: Implement a
> > > filesystem superblock creation/configuration context").
> > 
> > Am I right in thinking you're not using any of the LSMs?
> 
> Assuming LSM as in Documentation/lsm.txt, right not using any.

The default return value for security_fs_context_parse_param() should be
-ENOPARAM, both in security.h and security.c.

I've fixed my tree and Al has pulled it, but we're now waiting on Stephen
Rothwell to refresh linux/next.

David