linux-kernel - Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180910160836.GT5662@atomide.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:08:36 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept

* David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> [180908 15:28]:
> Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > Looks like next-20180906 now has a regression where mounting
> > > > root won't work with commit fd0002870b45 ("vfs: Implement a
> > > > filesystem superblock creation/configuration context").
> > > 
> > > Am I right in thinking you're not using any of the LSMs?
> > 
> > Assuming LSM as in Documentation/lsm.txt, right not using any.
> 
> The default return value for security_fs_context_parse_param() should be
> -ENOPARAM, both in security.h and security.c.
> 
> I've fixed my tree and Al has pulled it, but we're now waiting on Stephen
> Rothwell to refresh linux/next.

OK thanks for tracking that down, next-20180910 boots again
for me.

Regards,

Tony