[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180910212051.GB4697@amd>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 23:20:51 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
rteysseyre@...il.com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] leds: core: Introduce LED pattern trigger
Hi!
> >> I'm still convinced that this will confuse our users and to me it would
> >> be more logical if this denotes the number of times the pattern should
> >> be repeated, with e.g. negative numbers denoting infinite.
> >
> > Sounds reasonable. Let's change this semantics as you propose.
> >
> >> In particular I expect to have to explain why my driver expects that you
> >> write 0 in the file named "repeat" to make it repeat and 1 to make it
> >> not repeat.
>
> Hm, so there are some cases we need to make clear.
> 1) If negative numbers present infinite, so what's the meaning of number 0?
> 2) What we should show for users if repeat number is negative, just
> show negative numbers or one string "infinite"?
I'd say just -1 is infinite, anything else is error.
And yes, reading it should just display -1.
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists