[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdad=U5YACQ6k86A4BJo9-U4bC61A0kJ8kONSHu+u3BPyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:48:58 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
jacopo <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Renesas R9A06G032 PINCTRL Driver
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:59 AM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com> wrote:
> On 05 September 2018 10:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Have the VxWorks DT bindings been submitted for review to the devicetree
> > mailing list?
> I'm not involved with the VxWorks port, but I am pretty sure that they have
> not been submitted for review.
We have had other cases where deployments on other OSes have been
establishing bindings (even not very pretty ones).
Examples include typically the Power MacIntosh and the original SPARC
bindings.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists