lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <771fa1eb-85d3-2ff2-6070-207874da85b6@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:40:36 +0800
From:   "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu-refcount: relax limit on percpu_ref_reinit()

Hi Ming

On 09/11/2018 12:03 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> After the refcount is switched to atomic mode, the whole counting is
> done on the atomic part. Then if the refcount need to switch to percpu mode
> again, all percpu part of the counter is re-initialized as zero simply. This
> is invariant with/without this patch.

Does the "whole counting" here means ?

(long)(sum (every cpu's refcounter)) + atomic refcounter

and when switch to atomic mode, there could be value left in atomic refcounter.
then the unsigned long percpu refcounter cound be decreased from 0.
	
>From another angle, one request could be ended on a different cpu from the one where
it is issued.

Thanks
Jianchao

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ